Justin Bieber Go To Church

" Standardization policy "("... really nothing has changed in Venezuela ... Chavez their usual source of democratic simulation

BY: Armando Duran.

As noted last week, in mid-2010, the country's situation was explosive.

From this point of view, the regime saw September parliamentary elections as an essential outlet for the political pressure cooker Venezuela not to burst into pieces. However, in Hugo Chávez's calculations did not include the possibility that their qualified party losing its majority in the National Assembly, a setback that required the immediate enactment of the Enabling Act and the rapid adoption of a package of laws "socialist." However, to disguise the illegitimacy of these measures, the regime has been forced since then to present a more human face and democratic. good example of this tactical necessity was the visit of Minister Tarek el Aissami students on hunger strike at the gates of the OAS, which resulted in the release of seven political prisoners, revealed three significant events: a , Venezuela is not way of coming to any socialist sea of \u200b\u200bhappiness, but just barely trying to achieve some political normalization and languid style of the old regime ; two, although they have denied more than a thousand times in Venezuela other political prisoners are ; three , the judiciary is subject to the personal will of Chávez. Exprópiese, métanmelo prisoner them go, continue to control commands that the supposedly independent branches of government are complying exactly presidential.
Three other recent events suggest that really nothing has changed in Venezuela.

First, tangible demonstration of official contempt for the actual values \u200b\u200bof democracy, imposed Miraflores General Henry Rangel Silva to deliver the keynote address in tribute to Simon Bolivar civilian parliamentary par excellence of 15 February 1819, when he yielded to the legislators of the Gran Colombia, assembled in Angostura, absolute political power he held by virtue of their status as supreme commander of the Army. Remember to General Rangel Silva? The same captain coup of February 4 to the rank of general in chief for having warned Venezuelans that the troops under his command in any way allow Chavez's electoral defeat in 2012 elections.

The second mockery of the system, forced by the circumstances of the moment to give himself a coat of varnish urgent democratic, was to allow the questioning of his ministers by a multiparty National Assembly. The effect of this move has been a truly lamentable spectacle, whose most painful expression corresponded to Minister Jorge Giordani, econometric formula in hand, to attribute blame for the runaway inflation experienced by Venezuelans, most of the continent and one of the worst in the world, the oil strike of 2002 and the governments of the so-called fourth republic. What nerve! For now, the ultimate insult to the intelligence and sensitivity of Venezuelans uttered Chavez himself, who after ten days of inexplicable silence has now added his voice to those of Fidel Castro and Daniel Ortega to denounce the imperialist offensive against Gadhafi and order Nicolas Maduro, by the same social networks that have served the Islamic peoples of North Africa and the Middle East to organize their fight against autocracy in the region, drive them to the enemies of the Libyan brother. "Let's Foreign Minister Nicolas le wrote a tweet to your favorite minister, "another lesson to give them that right pitiyanqui! Viva Libya and independence! Gaddafi faces a civil war! ".
overcome the obstacles of April 11, the oil strike, of abstention 2005 of the 2007 referendum, parliamentary elections will be presented Chávez as an ideal springboard to steer the country in the direction of the desired normalization policy that would allow up to 2012 without major upheavals.

To his misfortune, not likely to be. The growing domestic crisis and international isolation, especially after of this wave of change in the Islamic world, takes away this time Chávez their usual source of democratic simulation. Moreover, solidarity with Gadhafi further isolates the civilized world.

After this, what president is the commander? Soledad "at the end of the dark tunnel of failure? On possible options for Chavez to escape this trap of history, will speak on Monday.

Source: http://www.noticierodigital.com/2011/02/normalizacion-politica/

Modern Wedding Cut Cake Songs

...")" The crisis in the Middle East and Venezuela "("... the price rise is a story that does not harm the Venezuelan Sheikh continually strive

BY: LUIS FERNANDO EGAÑA.

With regard to our country, the wave of conflicts that shook the Arab world and Iran, has at least two basic dimensions: a policy, referred to the demonstration effect of the struggle against autocracy continuity, and other economic , associated with increasing oil prices is taking place for the insurgency in Libya, and the potential for instability in other oil-exporting countries such as Algeria or Iran and especially Saudi Arabia.

For the first dimension, politics, Chavez's regime has been unable to escape to the respective analogies, particularly with more than ever impresentable Gaddafi; "the Simón Bolívar of Libya", not long ago claimed as his colleague and comrade Miraflores. Commentators have not failed Venezuelan Venezuelan playing peek of the massive public revolt in Tunisia, Egypt, Bahrain and the land of Gaddafi. Perhaps a consideration risky, and not by the lack of despotism vernacular but is packaged by the ability of democracy.

In this regard, Mr Chavez had tried to put in sidewalk of transgressions, until it was time for the "brother Gaddafi" and head right off it so the speech is not out to break lances in their favor, as they have done so Fidel Castro and Daniel Ortega. And it is likely that the tone is not as exhilarating as when they were to give a replica of the sword of the Liberator.

But ominous political front is offset with a vengeance, against the economic impact auspiciousness. Nothing is more gratifying for the fiscal voracity of a system-dependent mono oil prices, they rise in international markets. And they are going through the uncertainty created by events Revolutionaries in North Africa and the Arabian Peninsula.

What is, at least in the short term, a sort of "bonanza bonanza", because if the neighborhood of 80 or 90 dollars per barrel represented a great contribution to the Venezuelan oil basket, the increase in full swing produces an estimated "windfall" or a windfall for the Treasury coffers Bolivarist tight. Variable helping to fill the lockers of the revolution, especially when beginning a new election season.

As Venezuela is not in the Mediterranean or the Persian Gulf but in the Caribbean Basin, the political crises in oil-producing countries of that region tend to benefit the fiscal expectations of our petro-state, and whether the "economic management" is in the hands of Giordani and company, perhaps the worst government economic team of the 192 States that make up the United Nations.

However, the tumble of satrapies happens in that part of the planet, it could have consequences on long-haul expansive geography, but close in despotic nature. Only the passage of time may confirm this, but instead and verifies that the price rise is a story that does not harm the sheik's continual drive to Venezuela.

Source: http://www.noticierodigital.com/2011/02/la-crisis-del-medio-oriente-y-venezuela/